From request to assessment
Weeks to minutes
Baselex completes the configured assessment and returns the findings, evidence gaps and approval requirements in minutes. Your experts review exceptions and make the call.
How it worksThe verification layer for regulated decisions.
Baselex does the work.
Your experts make the call.
Baselex reads regulations, requirements and evidence, then returns a traceable assessment with findings, exceptions and required approvals. When configured inputs change, affected decisions are rechecked.
Built initially for quality, compliance and procurement teams in Pharma and MedTech.
The assessment is done.
The basis stays visible.
Traceable findings
Each result connects to the requirement, supporting evidence and next step.
Continuous audit readiness
Affected decisions are rechecked when configured rules or evidence change, rather than becoming another one-time assessment.
Your team sets the permissions. Routine actions proceed only within delegated authority; exceptions and actions requiring additional approval go to your experts.
Your experts should review the work,
not reconstruct it.
Finding the right regulation, tracking down evidence and reconciling records takes expertise away from the decision. When a rule or document changes, the work starts again.
Which rules apply?
Do we have the evidence?
What changed since last time?
GDPR says what’s required.
Baselex checks the evidence.
Can a customer-support provider handle your customers’ personal data? Agents check its agreement and security evidence against the relevant requirements.
In this fictional case, one requirement is met and another is not. The open check shows the exact GDPR paragraph, the cited passage in the agreement and why Baselex reached its result.
This GDPR illustration explains the approach, not a separate product offer. Today, start with third-party due diligence, available for demo and pilot discussions under Compliance on Autopilot.
Inspect the evidence trail3 checks · requirement-linked findings
GDPR checkFictional example
Can we share customer data with this service provider?
A customer-support provider processing personal data on our behalf.
Block
Not yet. A required contract clause is missing, and security safeguards still need to be verified.
Requirements checked Open a finding to follow its evidence trail
Use data only as instructedThe agreement includes this restriction. Met
-
The agreement must limit processing to documented instructions, subject to applicable legal exceptions.
- Evidence foundCustomer Data Processing Agreement.pdf
Clause 3.2 · Processing instructions · page 4
“The Provider will process Customer Data only on documented instructions from the Customer, except where required by applicable law.”
- Baselex assessmentMet
The clause limits processing to documented instructions and includes the applicable-law exception.
Delete or return data when the service endsThe required clause is missing. Not met
-
The agreement must provide for deletion or return of personal data at the customer’s choice when the service ends, and deletion of copies unless EU or Member State law requires storage.
- Evidence foundCustomer Data Processing Agreement.pdf
Section 12 · Termination and retention · pages 14 and 15
“The Provider may retain service records in line with its retention policy.”
- Baselex assessmentNot met
The section gives the customer no choice to delete or return personal data and does not address existing copies.
Appropriate security safeguardsEvidence of safeguards has not been supplied. Need evidence
-
The provider must offer sufficient guarantees and use security measures appropriate to the risks of the processing.
- Evidence foundSupplier evidence folder
Security safeguards · no file supplied
No security policy, control summary or certification was available to check.
- Baselex assessmentNeed evidence
This requirement cannot yet be verified because the supporting security evidence is missing.
What happens next?
Add the missing clause and obtain the security evidence. Agents recheck the findings; any required human approval still applies.
Real GDPR requirements; fictional documents and findings. Selected processor checks, not a full GDPR assessment or approval to share data. Read the EDPB guidance (opens in a new tab).
One verification approach.
Different workflows.
Start with compliance, or help shape the next application for AI governance.
Compliance on Autopilot
Available for demo and pilot discussionsAgent-led compliance checks for decisions your team must stand behind. Start with third-party due diligence, the first workflow, and evaluate it on one of your reviews.
Explore complianceAI Governance
In developmentHelp shape a developing workflow for teams reviewing an AI system before use: what evidence supports approval, what is missing and who needs to decide.
Explore AI governanceStarting with Pharma and MedTech.
Our initial focus is third-party due diligence for quality, compliance and procurement teams in these industries.
Pharma & MedTech
Exploring next
Bring your domain. Working in Finance, Tax, ESG, Supply Chain or another regulated area? Tell us which decision needs checking and where evidence work slows your team down. Together, we can explore the requirements and fit. These are future applications, not current offers.
See the work your team would review.
Walk through third-party due diligence in a demo, or bring a decision from your domain to discuss whether the approach fits.
Request a demo