A fictional third-party due diligence case showing the first workflow under Compliance on Autopilot, available for demo and pilot discussions. Follow what agents find and what a reviewer must resolve.
A health product may not be imported, manufactured or sold in Kenya unless it is registered under the Rules.
2
Evidence foundSupplier evidence folder
Amoxicillin 500 mg · Product registration
No PPB registration certificate or register reference was available to check.
3
Baselex assessmentNeed evidence
This check cannot be completed until evidence of the product’s registration in Kenya is supplied.
Next step
Provide the PPB registration certificate or register reference, then recheck.
Regulatory references link to official Kenya Law. The supplier, documents and findings are fictional. Any required approval remains with the accountable reviewer.
Illustrative · fictional case
The reviewer’s actions.
Resolve the premises mismatch
Request the separate wholesale dealer’s licence required for Nairobi DC-02.
Provide the missing registration
Obtain the PPB product-registration certificate or register reference for Amoxicillin 500 mg in Kenya.
Check again, then review
Baselex rechecks the replacement evidence. The reviewer handles remaining exceptions and required approval; receiving a document alone does not satisfy a requirement.
The result, with its basis attached.
A colleague returning to this case can see what was requested and why it remains unresolved:
The request
Qualify Meridian Medical Supplies for Amoxicillin 500 mg at Nairobi DC-02, Kenya.
The requirements
Section 27 requires site-specific wholesale licensing and pharmacist control. Registration Rules, 2022, rule 3 requires the health product to be registered before sale in Kenya.
The result
Block. The licence covers Mombasa DC-01, not Nairobi DC-02, and no product-registration evidence was supplied.
The review status
Unresolved. No approval has been recorded in this example.
New evidence. Another check.
In a configured workflow, Baselex monitors relevant inputs and rechecks affected decisions when evidence changes. Replacement documents may resolve these findings or reveal other issues; the earlier result is retained.
No replacement evidence or approval is recorded here. The example explains the process; it does not perform an assessment or authorise an action.